Jump to content

Pitbull 2


Graeme_M
 Share

Recommended Posts

For those of you that want additional ballast Andreas has a tungsten joiner solution for the PB2 and is placing an order soon 

G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Alibabaj said:

For those of you that want additional ballast Andreas has a tungsten joiner solution for the PB2 and is placing an order soon 

G

Already paid for some and Mike's going to collect it from Andreas at the comp.

8 pieces of tungsten for one wing joiner ,just under 1kg.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
6 hours ago, Pete Burgess said:

So what was Tony's verdict on the PB2?

Hi Pete,

First impression was very good, he soon had it going well in 5Ms on Whitesheet’s main Bowl.

I was a bit unsure to start with. Comparing back to back with my Jedi it just didn’t seem to accelerate as fast, but now it’s dialled in I love it. So much so I’ve just ordered a second one😁

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some additional info on the latest PB2’s

They do an extra strong fuselage layup for an additional €20, plus the wing ballast has increased, it still takes the 14x14mm plus additional 12x8mm alongside, see pic

719C9A47-5845-4E28-8D3A-3B74BCBBC56A.thumb.jpeg.77c78f3de30cbf9fd4e12801df8b02a5.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 21/10/2018 at 17:12, Alibabaj said:

I’ve just ordered a second one😁

Me too. According to Pavel, the inner nose cone has been beefed up as standard around the servo holes, as well as the changes Graeme has noted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was very noticeable how much stiffer Tony’s fuselage was compared to mine, especially the nose.

Feb delivery if ordered now

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oipigface said:

Me too. According to Pavel, the inner nose cone has been beefed up as standard around the servo holes, as well as the changes Graeme has noted.

the lack of ballast and servo holes were obvious flaws in the model. 

On rcgroups they had a dicky fit when i pointed this out.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, satinet said:

the lack of ballast and servo holes were obvious flaws in the model. 

On rcgroups they had a dicky fit when i pointed this out.

There's not a problem with lack of ballast Tom,I've got Tungsten in the wing and wing joiners. 

I've got way more than I need.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Les said:

There's not a problem with lack of ballast Tom,I've got Tungsten in the wing and wing joiners. 

I've got way more than I need.

 

Exactly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.