Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Sydney Lenssen

CIAM’S NEW RULES SPARK EXPLOSIVE REACTIONS

Recommended Posts

Sydney Lenssen

Can F3J survive the treatment meant to save it
What are the new rules?

Two weeks ago the RC Soaring Technical Meeting in Lausanne took the bull by the horns and introduced new rules aimed at saving F3J glider contests from sliding off the world and continental championship schedules - the death of what for many soaring pilots is the most popular of silent flight competitions.

Joe Wurts, the first F3J World Champion in 1998 at Upton-upon Severn, UK. Twenty years later with the latest F3J WC about to take place in Romania, many soarers are fearing that this could be the last.

Joe Wurts 1st F3J World Champion.jpeg

THE NEW RULES

From next year pilots can use electric winches - either/or hand held winches - for launching their models. The models must have a maximum surface area of 150 dm2 and a minimum loading of at least 20 gm/dm2. There will be no dropped round in fly-offs, and no reflights for mid-air collisions after 60 seconds into the slot.

CIAM, the world ruling body for this class is hoping that its new rules will halt the massive fall in numbers of F3J pilots wishing to compete, sixty per cent over the past five years and still falling, and restore its popularity.

But among many F3J pilots, the bull is still shaking its horns. There has been an extraordinary shock reaction: hundreds of pilots from all over the world have reacted on social media, protesting, angry and forecasting the end of this class. Many pilots are concerned, ranging from previous finalists and champions to your typical enthusiast who enjoys travelling across country and continental boundaries to participate in their friendly sport. Only a few can see the logic and reasoning and are prepared to wait and see how the changes work in practice. More than a few want CIAM to think again!

In all fairness, while not condoning some of the rude remarks, I still have severe doubts that F3J will survive. What I hope to write here is a sober report on F3J problems and why I believe that rules revision is vital. I remain hopeful that CIAM’s approved changes prove to be a step in the right direction.

WHY CHANGE MUST HAPPEN

How many pilots and helpers do you need to run an F3J competition?

Last summer I was shocked when speaking to Arijan Hucaljuk, world and european F3J champion in 2016 and 2017, to find that he had flown only one new F3J model that year. In Croatia there had been so few pilots wanting to qualify for Slovakia. He now has more F5J models and flew in this class more often than not.

In Britain, a survey was made of committed and earlier regular F3J pilots, asking their intentions for 2017. With great regret BARCS came to the conclusion that the F3J league to determine the national team could not be run. In previous years half a dozen or so qualifying rounds were contested. So GBR team 2017 was scrubbed and for the first time ever we had no team entered. Same applies this year for the Romanian world championship.

The BARCS committee reckoned that to run a typical one day low-key friendly contest you need to attract at least 16 pilots, and that would only give you four pilots per slot. Any last minute absentees would render the day scarcely possible. The days have gone when winning a place in the national team was the pride and joy of keen F3J pilots.

The numbers problem is not limited at national level. Despite the high entry fees payable to FAI championships for pilots, helpers and team managers, reduced entries increase the financial risk of running a championship. Until recently, opening and award ceremonies found the whole host town gathering in the main squares, sharing and enjoying the sight and excitement of pilots from so many countries. But they cost money.

The vital point is that to survive F3J must attract more pilots.

Why are numbers falling around the world? Main reasons are that as pilots grow older they cannot find the energy, ability and will to tow, and feel uneasy about not sharing the effort. The cost of models - competitive ones - has reached a level that deters all but the richest and keenest of youngsters and dads. When you do find a “youngster” - somebody no older than say 30 - he finds that he is trying to make friends with people 20 and sometimes 50 years older. The chance of an immediate meeting of minds and enjoyment are slim.

To survive as a class, F3J needs to go back to square one, the era in the 1980s when pilots from Holland, France, Germany and England found that they could meet to compete two or three times each summer, the birth of Eurotouring. The gliders they flew were often rudder/elevator. Single man tows were in order and the two-man variety was still 10 years away. Why was it popular? The participants were keen to see and watch F3B pilots, but that was a difficult sport taking greater skills, distance, speed and duration, three separate tasks. 

Why can’t we compete with something much simpler they would ask: simple duration with a 10 minute slot time, plenty of time to natter and swap experiences, and most pilots did not even launch on the buzzer - you waited until somebody bold enough found what looked like good lift.  

OK, that is oozing nostalgia and we are never to see such times again. But the lesson is that we need to find something much simpler and cheaper if we want to attract new people join the fun. F3J was born to be a simple thermal soaring contest, easy for anyone to join.

A look at the new rules

In March the CIAM 2018 agenda was published and Uncle Sydney’s Gossip column was revived to comment, and I made a mistake in concentrating on the proposal to allow winches for F3J launching. The main emphasis should have been given to the changes in the model’s specification, size weight and wing loading.

The Slovakian proposal for the meeting was that the weight of the model should be at maximum 1.7 kg, a very strange idea aimed at reducing costs. But as most delegates agreed, this did not address the issues.

The best and most convenient method of reducing the flight performance of F3J, as spelled out by Philip Kolb two years ago, is to limit the span and insist on a minimum wing loading.

What CIAM has decided is to go for a minimum surface loading, 20gm/dm2 and maximum surface area. I am told that other simpler options were debated, higher loading up to 23/25 gm/dm2, or a far easier, simpler to process requiring weight to be divided by the wing span with a minimum weight of say 0.6 kg per metre span.

Don’t be surprised if all these numbers in the rules are changed after trial runs in the years to come.
I don’t see that the new rules will necessitate many pilots to buy new models. It will be easy if necessary to simply add ballast. It will be interesting if the manufacturers find it necessary to develop new approaches to optimise performance. I have not seen so far any computer simulations to estimate the increase in sinking speeds and consequent loss of flight time.

What I understand is that in straight flight the higher wing loading will hardly affect sinking speeds. But flight times will reduce markedly in circular flight when to you fly into a patch of weak lift and you seek to centre the thermal. My own rough guess was to recognise that 150 dm2 max. area at 20 gm/dm2 equals 3 kg which I often ballast to in typical  UK winds. Unballasted my two current Supras weigh in at 2.1 and 2.3 kg.

Most experienced F3J pilots appreciate the excellent development work over the last 20 years put in by the main designers, producers and their dealers, in aerodynamics and materials and building techniques. CIAM’s new rules appear to protect producers from requiring to retool drastically, although some may not agree with that!

When the CIAM agenda was sent out before the meeting the proposal to allow winch launching gave little or no detail or rules to determine the specification of the winch and battery, and how winches would be used in the competition. It was indicated that the same specifications would be used as in F3B and that seems to have been followed in the issued minutes.

The minutes also say that for world and continental championships a maximum of six winches and six batteries may be used at any time on the winch line by each working team. Interchanging among winches and batteries…is totally  the responsibility of the competitor.

This appears to hint at what the rule makers mean to happen. Critics have wanted to know if winches and batteries are to be allowed to stay in place in the safety corridor, and how would the launching spots be arranged along the corridor? For any one round, the three man team will fly from one spot, with its six winches plus batteries. These are then cleared away to be laid out again in the next round at a different launching point along the line. 

There has also been speculation that if the number of teams competing exceeds the number of flight lines available, then two teams could occupy each launch point and the matrix could ensure that only one pilot would need to fly in that slot. That means two lots of six winches and batteries on the spot.

FAI championships progress at a leisurely pace and swapping positions along the line will even out fairness. 
It all sounds complicated but also feasible. What is not clear at present is what happens if hand towing is taking place also somewhere along the line, a potentially dangerous situation can easily occur. A few pilots I have spoken to feel that it won’t take long for winches to dominate and hand towing to disappear.

HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE MEDIA

The following section contains a selection of edited entries from Facebook, RC Groups and BARCS websites which give a flavour of what the world’s pilots thinking.

Darius Mahmoudi: was among the earliest inviting comments on CIAM decisions made by people not wanting us to keep F3J and its quality, or simply don’t understand what we do.

Jo Grini: F3K and F5J classes have rocketed sky high, possibly making F3B and F3J smaller. We should have come up with solutions that make it easier for new pilots and younger to enter.

Dominik Prestele: That rules are ****. We maybe gain 10 people and lose 100.

Massimo Verardi:  The new rules are not enough to change something but enough to make a lot of confusion.

Thomas Schoenbucher: Better decision would be to allow bungee. The funny fact is, I have enough old planes in the basement.

Marco Generali: In many countries the national championships already use winches, a small disadvantage while travelling, but less trouble than bringing a full team of towers. The 20gm/dm2 wing loading is a big limitation given the 1500 gm planes seen in recent years, but only the small amount of dead condition flights will be affected.

Marco Juznic: Keep the rules like they are, people who like F3J will continue to fly and help each other. Sooner or later people from F5J will come back because F5J will be overcrowded.

Tuomo Kokkonen:  In many countries winches are needed otherwise running a 10 pilot competition is not possible. But that does not mean that international F3J rules have to be changed. Eurotour flying as we know it will stop, and there is a danger F3J will die in Europe.

Joe Wurts: The conception of F3J was to bring back the “good old days” where stick and tissue open frame aircraft could have a world championship event. Prior to the first WCs I forecast that the event would evolve  to very high technology carbon fibre airframes with even higher strength/weight ratios than the F3B planes. It took a while, but this outcome eventually happened.

Conny Ulvestaf:  Not all pilots can get the super duper light models, now with the 20gm limit all will have the same equipment. F3J has had fantastic development in the last 5 years. Will this stop now? Probably. Is this good? Probably not.

Cederic Duss:  We need to find a way to push people to come. A winch won’t help.

Tobias Laemmlein:  Even worse than I was hoping. In a way we need to accept the new rules. I could live with the wing loading thing This will increase the level of competitive challenge and makes the pure thermal task more appealing. The leading edge in aeroplane development anyways has shifted towards F5J already. The winch will kill F3J, at least from the perspective that I, and let me guess many others too, the simplicity and the team.

Thomas Kiesling: For those that travel by air, winches are far cheaper than bring dedicated towmen. I’m not sure winches will save the class, but I also don’t think they should be a reason to kill it. There still will be a team aspect. It will just be different. Not necessarily better or worse, just different.

Graham Wicks: I have a nice Hollenbeck winch for sale. The 20 gm wing loading is like trying to take a step backwards. In the modern world you don’t reverse technology.

Joe Wurts: Lots of heartfelt comments. I remember making similar proclamations  of doom when HLG transitioned to DLG nearly two decades ago. Then I flew some DLG and got on board with the concept and my negative thought went by the wayside. One of the reasons why I’m not attending this year’s F3J WC is that we could not sort out a full team with helpers.

Tuomo Kokkonen: What do you think will happen to F3J Eurotours. Is there a practical way to continue despite the rule change?

Darius Mahmoudi:  I just can speak for my Contest in Riesa. If we continue next year, there will be local rules to mitigate this. But my concern is that there won’t be a lot of pilots left to participate.

Erik Dahl Christensen: It will always be valuable for subcommittee members to receive as much information and perspective as possible from  pilots with hands-on knowledge  from all classes. I know that Ralf Decker has made and tested a system to detect the exact release point and height. It was tested 2/3 years ago and can be used to make F3J look even more like F5J with more than time gain from  low launches. Is anybody interested?

Daryl Perkins: I for one am good with the winch rule. In this country (US) we had to fly off winches to keep F3J from dying.  I do understand that many of you will be against winches. At some point you will have to face the fact that without new blood coming into soaring, the use of winches becomes a necessary evil. I am quite disappointed with the minimum loading rule. It accomplishes nothing but shifting optimum design for each given condition. What it has done is turn the clock back 10 years….I don’t like to see technology going backwards.

Ryan Hollein:  It would be a pity if we change the rules and start with winches. We were flying in a German/Cyprus mix team (in Lviv) and had no problem getting our planes up. If we needed something there was always someone who offered us his help. This year I participated in 3 competitions flying with pilots from 7 different countries and we had lots of fun - and some problems understanding each other.

Philip Kolb: A minimum weight limit has little or no meaning as long as it does not come along with a maximum span limit. To emphasise thermal flying skills my proposal would be to implement a “sporty” definition of minimum weight and maximum span - say 2 kg and 3 metres??? - FUN!

Joe Wurts: 2kg and 3 metres kinda reminds me of the very first F3J planes!
I like the span limitation concept, maybe even more than a minimum weight limit. My only concern is visibility. My eyes aren’t getting any younger!

Jim Soars: Holy crap, winches are approved. I can’t wait to see the logistics of the flight line in a large competition.

isoaritfirst: I would be looking for the thrill of a nice thermal or the fun of hanging onto a small one. I’m less interested in sticking my nose in the dirt. Flying gliders is an attractive and competitive game. Perhaps F3J has concentrated too much on the comp at the expense of the grace, which attracted most of us into flying gliders in the first place.

Maria Freeman: If it is about “thermalling”, then reduce launch heights or increase slot times.

Bob Dickenson: I guess that we all ought to just get on with enjoying our flying as much as we can, while we can.

Austin:  If they are serious about saving F3J, then this comes to mind…

  1. Wing span max 3.1 m
  2. Minimum weight 2100g
  3. Maximum weight 2200g
  4. Nose radius should be fat to reduce dart board landings
  5. Single man tow with pulley and 130m line
  6. Line thickness max 1.15mm
  7. Pilots must use timer/launcher from opposing teams when not flying
  8. Pilots must not receive any advice or spotting from their timer/launcher unless it is a safety matter
  9. Bring back discard after six rounds flown

I am taking models back in time I know, but wasn’t it great then?

Richard Swindells: Austin’s ideas are great had they been implemented 10-15 years ago. However the bird has already flown the nest for F3J.
Models we are flying today launch higher, travel further and sink slower compared to what we were flying 10 years ago. Although sink rates might not have halved, overall performance has at least doubled.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

There is still a long way to go to sort out a whole host of questions. It is fortunate that these new rules will not be required until 2019, but I hope that opportunities will be used to test any new systems. We do not want to see a real championship frustrated by having to stop and debate how to proceed.

I think it would also be sensible to clarify the best way to continue with Eurotour events. It would be simple to just carry on with present existing and tested rules. There is a strong and important link between FAI and Contest Eurotour, and most of the Eurotour events carry the FAI symbol and flag. No reason to run championships and Eurotour with the same rules.

Sydney Lenssen

 

View full news and information

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Richard Swindells

It is no different to the 'real' world. Without the ability to quickly inspect and adapt to disruptive technologies, requirements and expectations, there is no opportunity to make change before it is too late. 

The reason classes like F3K and F5J have succeeded is simply because the older classes have not changed quick enough to suit the needs of modern competition. 

in 20 years I am sure that F3K and F5J will be under similar threat from other newly developed classes, simply because the structure of the FAI does not enable it to adapt quickly, once official classes are established. 

If you can change quickly, then implementing a "bad" change is not so detrimental, as the rules can quickly be rolled back or adapted to account. 

Neither does the "democratic" structure of NAC's and the FAI aid quick decision making. Having committees full of people who have been in the hobby for years causes a natural resistance to change to be even more entrenched. Having 2- year cycles for major rule updates makes it impossible to experiment, inspect and adapt because technology moves more quickly than that. 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EssexBOF

A very concise report as ever by Uncle Sydney, but it reminds of King Canute trying to push the waves back. F3j is as dead as other past aspects of modelling as times have moved on.

F5j lets all take part on a fairer basis than F3j. You don't need to recruit towers from the younger generation. Models can be made at home that can compete to the level o expensive ones or very close. Comps run faster allowing more flying.

That said,will what we do now exist in 10-20 years time, I think not as the younger element of our society move on to pastures new.

BARCS 230

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pete beadle

Well said Brian

For me, the problem seems to be not, will F3J survive, but whether  model flying of all and any types will still exist in the next 5-10 years

It's not really a problem to me, as I'm not expecting to be here when the hobby/sport I love hits the buffers, but my thoughts are directed toward all those potential model flyers that will be disappointed that they never had a chance to experience the pleasures that I've enjoyed all these years

A great pity, but  there's nothing I can do about it, so it's my intention to do as much flying as I can in the next few years and enjoy it while it lasts

And you are all very welcome to join me........

Regards

Pete

BARCS1702

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
satinet

Model flying will survive in some form, but not really glider flying. Unless it gets over regulated to the point it's not worth it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
thermaldoctor

There are still plenty of glider pilots in their 40's and 50's so in theory I would hope model glider flying will continue in some form format for at least another 20 or so years. But after that I think nothing for the reasons Brian and Pete have mentioned.

Unfortunately CIAM and the new F3j  ruling looks to have shot itself  in the foot. I for one am not against the new ruling but being friends and aquaintances with the majority of the remaining international F3j pilots I have been surprised at what a  negative reaction the decision has received.

It looks like the very rule meant to try and save F3j might have just killed it and possibly 2018 will be the last year we see of this brilliant class. I really miss it. Very sad 😞

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pete beadle

Hi Tom

What intrigues me most is that gliding, IMHO, is the most eco-friendly and least intrusive type of model flying. Usually we're using fields and hills that are well off the beaten track, and trying to minimise our intrusion into the areas most frequented by the general public

My main objection to allowing the gliders we fly to be classified and regulated as drones is that gliders/sailplanes/ basically, any silent flight models are so obviously NOT the problem.......

The competitions we attend are usually made up 100% of competitors in that competition - the "F" range of glider classes are most definitely not spectator sports - we try to be safe when we're competing in them, basically we're doing all the right things except allowing the planes we fly to be tarred with the same brush as drones - for me, that's our biggest mistake - but, you are right ,Tom, model flying WILL continue, just not in any form I want to get involved with.......indoor for example?  no thanks!

Whenever a situation like this arises, I'm reminded of the simple fact that no race, rally or any other type of competition ever increased its membership/participation by advertising how safe it is.......human nature, both the most complex and yet, at times, the simplest thing to blame 

Ah well

Regards

Pete

BARCS1702

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EssexBOF

Did not F3b die due to lack of interest, even when they tried using electric models?

F5j at Radio Glide this year has amassed   ---24 entry's Quote from Pete Mitchell CD 

Sad fact of life, numbers are reducing, with no new blood to replace them. Many long time BARCS members never go to Radioglide, and these days even less want to travel more than a few miles.

 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EssexBOF

One thing that has been on my mind for some time, is why F3j has not embraced the use of altimeter switches to record launch height from 10 seconds after release and then use the height penalty as in F5j to encourage lower launch heights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
paulj
On 04/07/2018 at 09:25, EssexBOF said:

One thing that has been on my mind for some time, is why F3j has not embraced the use of altimeter switches to record launch height from 10 seconds after release and then use the height penalty as in F5j to encourage lower launch heights.

Maybe quite difficult to detect the release point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pete beadle

Post removed

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EssexBOF
17 hours ago, paulj said:

Maybe quite difficult to detect the release point?

Aerobetec who make the Altis make one that triggers from the tow hook, now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
paulj
15 hours ago, EssexBOF said:

Aerobetec who make the Altis make one that triggers from the tow hook, now.

Fair enough! I was considering how to do it with a solid state gyro setup, but I can see many challenges with the different behaviours of the model at the point of release.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.