Jump to content

PROGLIDE – Home Built Composite F5J Glider - Update October 2018


ThermalBoy

Recommended Posts

In response to the call for some new website content here’s an update on what’s been happening development wise with the PROGLIDE since the last update (March 2017). Short answer, quite a lot! 

There has now been sufficient time and competitions since the last update to categorically be able to say that the PROGLIDE has shown itself to be a thoroughbred F5J design. I’m not going to list (boring for most people) the many comp successes Kevin and I have achieved with the PROGLIDE other than suffice to say there’s been quite a few of them. 

Kevin up till now has continued to champion our original wing section whilst I use only the thin winged Synergy section. Both versions have though shown themselves to be excellent performers. We have however found that the Synergy section version offers some advantages over the original wing section in that it hangs in there just as well but shows better penetration in the wind.

So what have we been up to over the past year and a half? Firstly we decided that we would like to slim down the fuselage pod to make it more streamlined in its appearance and have a little less air resistance/drag but to still have enough internal space to get everything in without any shoehorning. The attached pictures clearly show just how much its been slimmed down far better than any words can. Kevin, the teams master mould maker, set to work making a new plug followed by new moulds. He did a great job as the pictures show. The other major item we both felt the design would benefit from going forward was to have the ability to produce our own custom sized/lay-ups booms. Whist the commercial versions we have been using certainly did the job they were a tad too lightweight and the size at the tail end was not optimum. After watching a bunch of Youtube videos on the best way for the home builder to make booms we went the opposite way and decided to mould the booms! I had an old Fendon fibreglass boom from way back that just happened to be the ideal size for our new fuselage pod and Kevin used this to make the new boom mould. Unfortunately I forgot to take any pics of the new boom moulds but will do so when I next use them.

I had pretty much got on top of producing the carbon fuselage pods to a good standard and right from the first pull the new pods worked out really well. It was a lot stronger and less “Squidgy” under the wing than the original version it was replacing and at 88g AUW, it was light. Next up was the new booms. I had no idea what layup would provide the required rigidity/strength and weight we were looking for. At first I thought the easy way would be to do simple short sections of boom with different layups to determine this. This didn’t work out as I later realised of course that you needed the entire length of the boom in order to test the lateral flex was rigid enough. So no option other than to do various full size test lay-up’s to determine what worked. Home composite building is all about testing , getting it wrong followed by more testing! Laying the booms up in long thin moulds is no easy task to get it spot on and I am still working on the best way to achieve 100% results 100% of the time. Having said that even the first boom out of the mould with a little post production repair work, was totally usable and at 45g not too bad. Its overall strength/rigidity is significantly better than the commercial versions we had been using but it did weigh 9g more. Kevin in fact has used this first boom on his latest model, the PROGLIDE EXTREME. (More on this later).  After four complete boom test/lay-ups our preferred lay-up was defined. (Outer -  40g Carboline, Middle-200g UniCarbon, Inner 120g R&G Fibreglass) Final weight of the booms with this lay-up was 41g. Hopefully the weight will continue to come down with more practice. Making the bladders for the booms turned out to be a PITA compared to the fuselage pod bladders, so I’m investigating alternatives for this. We are often asked what pressure we use with our bladders. It surprises a lot of people when they are told it’s between 6-9 psi. The variable air pressure for this task is handled by a £50 EBay airbrush compressor which has a small air reservoir tank.   You would be amazed at how much epoxy is expelled from the moulds even at this relatively low psi! I’m sure you’d be able to expel a little more epoxy with a higher psi but its not required for home building as the pics show. 

Next up was a complete re-work of the spar structure for the centre panel to try and limit wing flex particularly with the thin Synergy sectioned wing. It was decided to completely re-design the spar structure and how it was made. It’s now produced completely outside of the wing and then dropped into a full span channel that is cut from the underside of the wing that finishes 2mm from the top surface of the wing. This has the added benefit that the top surface of the wing requires no additional finishing and gives a perfect top surface ready for lay-up/bagging. Only the underside of the wing where the spar channel is requires minor filling/sanding.  The spar uses the protruded commercial 0.5 x 10mm carbon strip top and bottom with solid foam in-between which is then completely wrapped in carbon sock. At the centre of the wing the spars have a substantial moulded carbon dihedral brace that extends out approx 125mm each side. This is made using a simple right angled Aluminium mould. The pics again show it better than words do. I do my spars in two bits and then join the centre panel with the dihedral brace but Kevin makes the entire spar assembly in one piece and drops it into the entire wing centre section in one go. Both methods work fine. Joiner boxes at the ends of the centre section are made by using carbon sock moulded over a 10 x 10mm Ali square tube. Two complete wraps of greaseproof paper are first put around the Ali before the carbon sock is slid on, stretched out and epoxy applied. The greaseproof paper must extend past the ends of the sock by 50mm to ensure no epoxy creeps under it. The greaseproof paper also provides the working clearance fit for the joiners. This technique allows the lightweight carbon joiner box’s to slide off easily from the aluminium after its removed from bagging. The greaseproof paper simply twists out and away from the inner shell of the box’s. Voila, perfect lightweight wing joiner box’s. The same technique is used to produce the carbon tubes now used in the Fin/Rudder. (See pics). 

New lightweight wing joiners have been produced to keep the weight/inertia down towards the tips as low as possible. The original method of production resulted in each set of joiners weighing approx. 25g. A set of the new joiners weighs approx. 9.5g! At the moment we are carrying on using our original method of spar set-up for the wing tips. Needless to say there is a lot less stress on the wings at the tips compared to the centre section. If however it proves to be the case that the wing tips need or would benefit from the new spar construction method, albeit with a small increase in weight, we will do so.

A simplified/lighter method of attaching the fin/rudder to the boom has now been designed. (see pics).
One thing that really helped us with the continuing development of the PROGLIDE was the acquisition of a 3D printer. (Every modeller should have one!). We are using this to produce all sorts of PROGLIDE parts including, motor mounts, servo frames, tail pod twin servo carrier, wing end ribs, control horns, centre panel  Mpx wing/fuselage plug/socket holders, small part moulds and so on. It’s probably the most useful thing I’ve ever bought for modelling. It took me a bit of time to get on top of it all but it was worth the effort for sure.

Finally, this leads me on to our latest development, the PROGLIDE EXTREME. We are currently both building a reduced span (3.55m) version, which will still be light (1150-1250g AUW) but that can handle being  ballasted with up to 700-800g of ballast for windy weather use without excessive wing flex.  Well that’s the plan at least. The smaller span should also help the tight turning ability in small thermals.  Kevin has already produced his EXTREME’S super stiff centre panel using the new centre panel spar lay-up and to quote his words ”I think it would take an F3J tow”. I find that observation reassuring! However, as always, only time and testing will confirm this.

The pics attached to this update say a thousand words but if you have any questions please feel free to ask and we will do our best to answer them. 

Colin Paddon / Kevin Beale

 


View full f5j article event or report

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent Colin, you (and Kevin) are an inspiration to the few of us willing to attempt such a build.  And thanks for sharing the ideas, its obvious that you two have put a lot of thought and trial and error into every stage – I wish you well.

As some sort of encouragement to anyone else that may be thinking of undertaking such a project, when I started (and all I done so far is build spars and wing joiners and a practice tail or few) I knew very little about building a composite glider but a bit of internet searching and a lot of thinking and its all achievable.  It's thanks to people like Colin and Kevin that make our builds easier.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colin and Kev,

Great to read the article and see the effort going into developing the Proglide. Fantastic to see the evolutionary steps and techniques being used in its construction. I hope it spurs people to have a go at a bit of building even if "only" for a joiner or fin/rudder, but something that will spark that creative fire and get people trying new things. I worry that people never get to experience the buzz of creating something from scratch, and those that have, know how sad it is that these folks won't. Keep up the good work and rest assured some of us out here are following this with interest, and wholeheartedly support what you are doing.

Tim

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Great that you’re sharing your experience with the world, or at least BARCS members.

John and I are tinkering in the same area as you know; and it was interesting to see John’s first wing test (bolted atop an old Shadow fus’)  at Buckminster this weekend. Looks promising!

Continuing development ideas between us are leading away from the compact storage 4 piece wing to a more common 3 piece. Having said that, the ‘compact’ idea is still attractive to me. This requires a two piece fus’ , plugging together at the field, along with the four piece wing. Storage result would be less than 100mm length. Imaging being able to go to an F5J event in a tiny car? 

Back to the three piece wing: Fuselage plug now needs updating for the new wing ideas. We will probably go with a couple of ‘lost-foam’ trials first, prior to committing to actual mould making. 

Keep up the inspirational work

Neil P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Marc RC pilot

Amazing inspirational work Colin and Kevin!

Thank you for sharing and showing what is possible. 

 

Regards

 

Marc  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
muhammad jawad majid malik

Bravo Collin !

Impressive work.

I happen to join just recently and  want to build one myself. Undeniably, would need all help from you friends out there. The pictures are a great help but would be able to start if ;

1. Drawings showing sizes / dimensions and all spars / stiffeners

2. The lay-up configuration of all fiber material.

3. Small parts that need machining or 3D printing

I happen to have access to CNC machining and can make molds at no cost at all. Would prefer doing the wings / fuselage that way. All advise would me more than welcome.

Thanks.

Sincerely,

Muhammad Jawad 

United Arab Emirates

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, muhammad jawad majid malik said:

Bravo Collin !

Impressive work.

I happen to join just recently and  want to build one myself. Undeniably, would need all help from you friends out there. The pictures are a great help but would be able to start if ;

1. Drawings showing sizes / dimensions and all spars / stiffeners

2. The lay-up configuration of all fiber material.

3. Small parts that need machining or 3D printing

I happen to have access to CNC machining and can make molds at no cost at all. Would prefer doing the wings / fuselage that way. All advise would me more than welcome.

Thanks.

Sincerely,

Muhammad Jawad 

United Arab Emirates

Hi Muhammad

Firstly welcome to the BARCS Forum. There are many people on this forum who can offer help and advice on all things RC Soaring.

In regard to your specific questions about the Proglide, perhaps the best answer I can provide is to read/look at the pictures contained within the other Proglide thread located here.

https://www.barcs.co.uk/f5j/articles-events-and-reports/articles/proglide-home-built-composite-f5j-38m-glider-update/

Benny P recently asked questions similar to yours in this particular thread which along with the words/pictures provided in both threads cover most things to do with construction.

Kevin and I continually evolve the design year on year so nothing is set in stone, in fact its very fluid!   I can confirm that we now  use only Carbon Fibre Cloth for the entire construction.  At the moment the wingspan is 3.8m but Kevin recently built a 3.5m version for windy weather/testing. There are also plans to increase the wingspan to 4m at some point in the future. Also I have ready for test flying a V Tail Version as soon as the Covid-9 restrictions are eased.

The whole Proglide project is a labour of love but its very rewarding to see our home designed/built plane competing on equal terms with the professionally made models.

Hope this info helps.

Colin

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

muhammad jawad majid malik

Bravo Collin !

Impressive work.

I happen to join just recently and  want to build one myself. Undeniably, would need all help from you friends out there. The pictures are a great help but would be able to start if ;

1. Drawings showing sizes / dimensions and all spars / stiffeners

2. The lay-up configuration of all fiber material.

3. Small parts that need machining or 3D printing

I happen to have access to CNC machining and can make molds at no cost at all. Would prefer doing the wings / fuselage that way. All advise would me more than welcome.

Thanks.

Sincerely,

Muhammad Jawad 

United Arab Emirates

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

muhammad jawad majid malik

Cheers !

Sifting through the contents of the posts, I found plenty of information. Thank you indeed.

How about the di-hedral angles? Somewhere 3 to 5 Degrees ? Please advise.

Fuselage / Tail  sizes?

Joint details ! How do you join two wing sections and secure them with some fasteners ???? I would love to follow the procedure you had adopted.

I do Pray we get out of this Covid situation the soonest.God Bless All.

Sincerely,

Muhammad

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

muhammad jawad majid malik

Hello Collin !

I did some more research into your design of the PROGLIDE. Glad, came out with more information. I have appended it below and would request you to elaborate over a few further please;

1.        WING CORD ETS.

a.        Centre Panel Root Chord  is 260mm (Total length of Centre Panel is 1400mm, ie 2x700mm)

b.        Centre Panel Tip Chord is 240mm

c.         

d.        Tip Root Chord is 240mm (total length of tip is 1200mm)

e.        Mid Tip Chord is 170m (Length of mid tip section is 825mm)

f.         Tip End Chord is 93mm ((Length of final tip section is 375mm)

2.        Number of SPARS running along the length of the wing? One main spar of square cross-section is pretty visible.

3.        What is size of the spar?

4.        FLAPS / AILERONS, their sizes and position on the wing?

5.        Wing planform? Looks like “SCHUEMANN” to me. The trailing edge of the wing is straight?

6.        THE WING JOINT – the angled cross sectional tube that joins two wing sections, what is size of the latter? I would request for the cross section size and the length of the same. How much of the length it occupies inside the recess of each wing?

A picture is placed below.

image.png.7322ac39d20250e5c5fdde08b48b11dd.png

Understandably this joins two wing sections

You must forgive me for this barrage of questions.

SIncerely,

Muhammad

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

muhammad jawad majid malik

So sorry, missed out the following:

c. Tail control surfaces, their sizes and position. Fuselage and tail Boom size?

😊

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

muhammad jawad majid malik

Hello Collin !

I did some more research into your design of the PROGLIDE. Glad, came out with more information. I have appended it below and would request you to elaborate over a few further please;

1.        WING CORD ETS.

a.        Centre Panel Root Chord  is 260mm (Total length of Centre Panel is 1400mm, ie 2x700mm)

b.        Centre Panel Tip Chord is 240mm

c.         

d.        Tip Root Chord is 240mm (total length of tip is 1200mm)

e.        Mid Tip Chord is 170m (Length of mid tip section is 825mm)

f.         Tip End Chord is 93mm ((Length of final tip section is 375mm)

2.        Number of SPARS running along the length of the wing? One main spar of square cross-section is pretty visible.

3.        What is size of the spar?

4.        FLAPS / AILERONS, their sizes and position on the wing?

5.        Wing planform? Looks like “SCHUEMANN” to me. The trailing edge of the wing is straight?

6.        THE WING JOINT – the angled cross sectional tube that joins two wing sections, what is size of the latter? I would request for the cross section size and the length of the same. How much of the length it occupies inside the recess of each wing?

A picture is placed below.

image.png.7322ac39d20250e5c5fdde08b48b11dd.png

Understandably this joins two wing sections

You must forgive me for this barrage of questions.

SIncerely,

Muhammad

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

muhammad jawad majid malik

Thanks.

Let me get a start. Indebted for the help.

Sincerely,

Muhammad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hello, 

Your PROGLIDE is amazing. I made my homemade gliders too and i know the troubles to skip.

I want ask you about the material you cut the wing core. In some pics It seems roacell. That’s it?

I have heared cutting roacell with hot wire is dangerous and I never do. My cores are made with XPS porex.

 

Regards,

Miquel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/07/2020 at 22:35, Miquel said:

Hello, 

Your PROGLIDE is amazing. I made my homemade gliders too and i know the troubles to skip.

I want ask you about the material you cut the wing core. In some pics It seems roacell. That’s it?

I have heared cutting roacell with hot wire is dangerous and I never do. My cores are made with XPS porex.

 

Regards,

Miquel

Hi Miquel

Glad you like the Proglide. Yes many things to learn along the way with homebuilt composite planes! The foam we use  is  XPS type foam, same as you.

Regards

Colin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Colin is continuously experimenting most things from boom lengths to tail types. Here is his T tail version as flown in the Kent Interclub/ Bartletts competition at Gravesend on Sunday 18th April 2021. Looks especially magnificent at higher altitudes where it was most of time. He won! Photos by Mike Connell 

Colin Paddon T-tail Proglide 2.jpg

Colin Paddon T-tail Proglide 1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-tail should be a good config for height limiter cut off models, because the Bernouli effect of the faster air under the tail requiring down trim during the power-on phase (so it should kill the stall itself when the motor cuts). Does anyone use height limiters now?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Neil Harrison said:

Hey Colin 

Love this T tail design, looks awesome 😍

Thanks Neil.

You can certainly see at a glance which model is yours in the sky! Requires more trimming out but it shows promise.

Colin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.